Updates from May, 2009 Hide threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • AVC on Conferences 

    epigonic 11:32 pm on May 31, 2009 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment

    Fred Wilson has a good post up on conferences, here’s the key line:

    … the idea of travel to get together with the same old group, the tech biz insider club, doesn’t appeal to me at all.

    I think that’s completely right. Someone really ought to do a survey of the top conferences to look at the overlap in speakers and attendees. Let’s face it, there are a lot of conference whores out there in the tech world.

    The notion one has to go to conferences for “biz dev” or “PR” is misplaced. I think the unspoken reason so many of the same people go to the same conferences is their purely personal need for approbation and ego-stroking. People like being recognized by their peers, and that can happen in a conference setting.

    My personal experience is that I get a lot more out of meeting with people who use our service, or might use it–  1-on-1, online, in-person, or on the phone — than I get going to conferences. Much more valuable, useful insights come from those conversations.

    All this said, there have been some exceptions. eTech ‘05 (O’Reilly) was good and useful for me personally –  timely themes, great speakers who were still fresh presences and voices at that point (before the Web 2.0 idea had become mainstream). More specific, tailored conferences for platforms or programming languages can be interesting, too (I spent the morning at WordCamp yesterday, and it’s an interesting way to get deep into what’s happening with a particular service and community).

    But the more general, better known conferences I’ve attended the past two-to-three years proved to be big wastes of time and money. Same people, saying the same stuff, with pointless schmoozing and gossip in-between.

     
  • London Mayor Nearly Killed While Cycling – The Lede Blog – NYTimes.com 

    epigonic 4:06 am on May 24, 2009 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment

     
  • Coming Soon — My Real Time Web Jeremiad 

    epigonic 12:13 am on May 24, 2009 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment

    The frothiness around the real-time web is starting to devolve into silliness, and I want to write about this in greater depth over the long weekend.

    But here are three initial thoughts:

    1. Twitter and FriendFeed and other real-time tools could go away tomorrow, and most of us could still use the web just fine. If Google went away tomorrow, it would be a major inconvenience and potentially a disaster. We’re just not dependent on these things the way we’re dependent on Google, and we’re not likely to ever be dependent on them.

    I think that says something.

    2. I think one useful analogy is the relationship between online chat and e-mail. Chat is real time, e-mail is latent.

    Chat of course is important, and useful. But it didn’t kill e-mail. Not even close — read the latest Pew studies and e-mail is as critical and important as ever.

    The real-time web technologies are important, and might be useful. But to claim that this is the next great wave, that it might replace search, that Google is imperiled by it in some way, is more or less horseshit.

    3. The big revolution — one we’re still in — started in 2002-3 with the creation and mass-market adoption of tools and services that allow us all to publish our own content, and to share content with each other. I mean the advent of easy-to-use publishing tools (blogs, flickr, YouTube, etc), social networks, services like Digg, feed readers. Twitter is a part of this wave, and an important part.

    It is this revolution that most challenges Google — a proliferation of tools and services that allow us to find good content through other people. Some of these services and tools have real-time web components, some don’t — that’s an aspect of the revolution, not the center of it.

     
  • Cities and Scale 

    epigonic 9:28 pm on May 6, 2009 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment

    One of the obvious things about cities, especially those of the dense and very urban variety, is that they scale. It’s such an obvious point I wonder if it’s even worth pointing out; but then, we haven’t really learned that lesson yet in America.

    I’m just wrapping up my fourth trip to New York in an equal number of months. As I’ve gotten older, and have travelled more and have more cities to compare it to, it has become more obvious that the city just works. Particularly the subway and train systems (some resident New Yorkers would surely grumble in hearty disagreement with me).

    Compared to other cities, it’s a breeze to get around. In the last five days, I got in a cab just once. The rest of the time was on subways and trains. And it all just worked (it delighted, even). The #2 or #3 express uptown and your at your Midtown meeting from Tribeca in 10 minutes. The combination of express trains and locals. The LIRR train and AirTrain combo that gets you to JFK in 50 minutes, with trains leaving every 10 minutes from Penn. Station.   All of this possible because of the sheer scale of the city.

    London (where I lived for 3 years) has this, too (without the brutal and awe-inspiring efficiency of New York). Tokyo and Paris as well.  These cities are a delight to visit because they’re easy to get around. They operate at scale, taking advantage of their densities and burgeoning populations. Cities like San Francisco (and I include the Bay Area), Chicago, Washington and Berlin are the next level down — good, but not yet great, because they dont’ quite have the scale of these bigger cities.

    Contrast those to LA, Atlanta, Houston — all horrible places to get around, and which diffuse the power of scale through their sprawl. Do our urban planners and transportation planners think of it this way — the advantages of scale? Are there books that push this theme? If you know of any, would love tips in the comments.

     
  • Lists 

    epigonic 12:56 am on May 2, 2009 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment

    I have a rant all queued up about the ridiculous hype over “real time” on the Web. I think this note from Dave Winer — on FriendFeed, about FriendFeed! — gets at some of the silliness being peddled.

    But before I get to my rant, I’ve been doing a mental inventory of sites that matter, to me at least(excluding hardware, OS’s, and work-focused apps). It’s useful, as I think it starts to drive at what is really important.

    Sites or web services I use everyday and love:

    Google
    Google Maps
    Netvibes (so ignored now, I have a whole post to write about it)
    Wikipedia
    Vodpod :-)
    YouTube

    Sites or web services I use less frequently, but love:

    Craigslist
    Flickr
    Last.fm
    WordPress
    del.icio.us
    Chow

    Sites or web services I use everyday, but with ambivalence:

    Gmail
    Twitter

    Sites or services I use, but with teeth gritted:

    Facebook
    FriendFeed (new version)

    Outright failures (tried and abandoned):

    Google Reader
    Myspace
    Countless others I’ve since forgotten.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel